Sweden News USA ESTA Travel Pass

It was calculated that more than 1.9 million people were newly issued Real IDs in California last year. The California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) announced that the number of residents with Real IDs as of January 1 this year was 16,870,178, an increase of 1,932,668 over the past year.

Real ID is a new California driver’s license and ID card issued in accordance with federal government standards. Starting in May 2025, it will be the only means of identification, other than passport, when boarding at airports and entering federal government buildings.

To apply for Real ID, you must visit the website (REALID.dmv.ca.gov), fill out an online application, upload the required documents, and make an appointment.

According to the DMV, the documents required for a visit include one form of identification (valid passport, birth certificate, etc.), two forms of proof of California residency (utility bill, bank statement, etc.), and a Social Security number.

Reuters reported on the 2nd that the United States plans to resume traffic at four border areas with Mexico on the 4th due to a decrease in illegal immigration. The places where traffic with Mexico is resumed are the bridge at Eagle Pass, a border town in Texas, two checkpoints in Arizona, and the checkpoint in San Diego, California. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) closed bridges and checkpoints one after another in December last year as the number of immigrants entering the U.S. through the border with Mexico surged to an unmanageable level, reaching nearly 11,000 per day.

The U.S. delegation, including Secretary of State Tony Blinken, paid a courtesy call on Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador on the 27th of last month and decided to hold a high-level meeting with Mexico and cooperate closely to resolve the immigration issue. Mexico’s Foreign Ministry welcomed the resumption of traffic along the U.S. southern border in a statement, saying it would “benefit the economies of both countries.” Citing an internal U.S. government report, Reuters reported that U.S. border authorities apprehended an average of 6,400 migrants per day last week, a significant decrease compared to before Christmas.

Additionally, the Associated Press reported that the Biden administration asked the Supreme Court on the 2nd to allow the state of Texas to remove the barbed wire fence it installed on the border with Mexico. Texas Governor Reg Abbott, a Republican, installed barbed wire along 48km of the Rio Grande River near the border town of Eagle Pass as immigrants flocked from Mexico to Texas.

Federal government workers began cutting the barbed wire, but an appeals court ruled in favor of Texas last month, ordering them to stop. Then, the U.S. Department of Justice filed an urgent appeal to the Federal Supreme Court, asking to suspend the effectiveness of the appeals court ruling.

Governor Abbott is also pursuing the installation of an ‘underwater barrier’ in the Rio Grande River and is engaged in a legal battle with the Biden administration, which points out a violation of related laws.

The U.S. Department of Defense is said to be considering whether to directly attack the pro-Iran Yemeni rebels Houthis, who are increasing the level of provocations in the Red Sea under the pretext of supporting the Palestinian armed political faction Hamas. U.S. media outlet Sema Citing multiple U.S. government officials, Semafor reported on the 16th that the U.S. government is having such discussions due to concerns that the Houthis and Iran are trying to harm global maritime trade.

According to reports, officials are weighing their decision-making with the possibility that a direct U.S. attack on the Houthis could escalate into a broader war against Iran and other pro-Iranian armed groups. So far, U.S. officials have emphasized that they are focusing only on supporting the Israeli battle to eradicate Hamas as their top priority but have expressed their stance that they are not ruling out more offensive military operations. U.S. Department of Defense spokesman Patrick Ryder emphasized this week, “We will not hesitate to act when we deem it necessary, including to defend against activities in the maritime domain that threaten our military.”

This discussion by the United States came as the Houthis, who are hostile to Israel and the United States, have repeatedly targeted civilian ships in the Red Sea, a major trade route, due to their support for Palestine.

The Houthis have attacked civilian ships in the past 10 years. Since the Israel-Hamas war began on February 7, civilian ships have been attacked in a bid to retaliate and pressure Israel. Initially, ships related to Israel were attacked, but since last week, they have been targeting ships from Norway, Hong Kong, and Liberia. The target of attacks was expanded by targeting ships not directly related to the war.

Large shipping companies, concerned about indiscriminate attacks by the Houthis, suspended or considered suspending operations through the Red Sea. We are struggling to respond.US officials believe that the Houthi attacks are aimed at disrupting trade entering Israel and increasing the cost of support for Israel by the US and its allies.

The Bab el-Mandeb Strait, the entrance to the Red Sea, is connected to the Suez Canal and is a major maritime transportation route, accounting for about 30% of the world’s maritime container traffic and 12% of the merchandise trade volume.

The number of ships passing through this route, which is the passage for most of the oil and natural gas produced in the Persian Gulf and exported to Europe and North America, reaches 20,000 per year. However, the US attack on the Houthis is strategic.

Many former Defense Department officials believed that the United States had no choice but to attack the Houthis if it wanted to maintain the flow of global trade, Semafor reported. Reserve Admiral John Miller, who commanded the U.S. Navy in the Middle East, emphasized, “We will not succeed until we make the Houthis pay (for their attacks).”

On the other hand, other former and current Defense Ministry officials warned that they could face greater danger if they attack the Houthis. ‘Resistance against the West There are concerns that attacking the Houthis could result in simultaneous retaliation from multiple places because there are solidarity armed forces claiming to be part of the ‘axis’. US Special Operations in the Middle East Michael Nagata, a reserve lieutenant general who commanded the unit, said, “Right now, Iran is in the strongest strategic position,” and pointed out, “This is bad timing.” If the United States were to kill the Houthis, if there is a direct attack, it will be the first time in 7 years since 2016.

The United States launched a Tomahawk cruise missile in retaliation for the Houthis’ missile attack on a US Navy destroyer in October 2016, targeting the Houthis’ coastal radar. Part of the facility was destroyed.

In Texas, where abortion is completely banned, a pregnant woman in her 30s filed a lawsuit to allow abortion in exceptional circumstances, but when the court refused to allow it, she ended up leaving Texas to get an abortion.

The Centre for Reproductive Rights, which represents Kate Cox, 31, the pregnant woman who filed the lawsuit, said in a statement on the 11th, “Cox left Texas to receive an emergency abortion necessary to preserve her health.” “After a week of threats of legal action and prosecution from Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, Cox was forced to leave Texas and seek medical care outside the state,” the centre claimed.

Previously, Cox, a mother of two children living in Dallas, Texas, decided to have an abortion after much deliberation after being diagnosed in August that her third child, who was pregnant, had a fatal genetic disease caused by an abnormality in the 18th chromosome, and filed a lawsuit to allow exceptional abortion procedures. was filed in state court on the 5th.

Texas bans abortion at almost any stage of her pregnancy. In Texas, if a doctor violates the abortion ban, he or she can be sentenced to up to 99 years in prison and fined at least $100,000. Cox, who is 20 weeks pregnant, has a very high risk of the foetus being stillborn or dying within a few weeks of birth, and as she has previously given birth to a child by caesarean section, there is a risk of uterine rupture if the foetus is stillborn this time, and she will never be pregnant or give birth again.

The trial judge who heard the lawsuit ruled that Cox’s situation met the criteria for an exception to the state’s abortion ban and allowed medical staff to perform abortions. However, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican, immediately appealed to the state Supreme Court, saying Cox’s situation did not meet the criteria for exceptions, such as cases where the mother’s life was in danger.

The state Supreme Court, all Republicans, put on hold the first trial decision to prevent abortions from being performed before the final ruling in this case is made on the 9th, and has not issued a ruling on the merits since.

Nancy Northup, president of the Centre for Reproductive Rights. “She couldn’t wait any longer because her health was at stake.” “As a result of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade, women were forced to beg for urgent medical care in court,” she said. “Kate’s case shows the world that abortion bans are dangerous for pregnant women and that exceptions are ineffective.” “I showed it to you,” she emphasized.

The Centre for Reproductive Rights said it had sent Cox an offer to help people obtain abortion services in states such as Kansas, Colorado, and Canada, where abortion is legal. However, the centre did not reveal which area Cox went to.

This lawsuit is attracting attention as the first attempt by a pregnant woman to seek emergency relief against state law since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the Roe v. Wade decision that guaranteed abortion rights last year and allowed states to enact abortion bans. collected.

There is a ‘world famous’ hot dog place in Oregon. It is not a big city like Portland or Eugene, but Lang Roy, a small town on the southern coast that is marked on the map. It goes even further down in North Bend.

Rather than being a specialty restaurant, it is sold along with other delis at ‘Lang Roy’s Market’, the only grocery store in the area. Nevertheless, in this town with about 175 residents, hundreds of hot dogs are sold every day.

During the summer, up to 8 boxes are sold out, with each box containing enough for each resident. The owner told OregonLive.com that there are customers from out of town who travel hundreds of miles to eat these hot dogs.

The history of Lang Roy’s hot dogs began in 1981. At the time, this market was supplying lunch sandwiches to about 30 workers at a nearby sawmill, but the supply line was suddenly cut off. The owner decided to sell hot dogs instead. The mother-in-law who came up with the idea assured that hot dogs with her secret mustard taste better than sandwiches.

She was right.

The hot dogs became a best-seller at Lang Royce Market and continued to sell well after the mill closed in the 1990s. Jake Pestana, the current owner who inherited the car, said he probably sold 1.5 million units over the past 40 years. He is also taking orders for ‘World Luxury’ hot dogs online.

However, the promotional phrase ‘world famous’ was not given because of Lang Roy’s hot dogs.

When residents asked the state Department of Transportation to limit vehicle speeds on Route 101, which runs through the neighbourhood, in 2014, the Department of Transportation refused, saying the “road culture” was not in place to require vehicle speed restrictions. In protest, residents took it upon themselves to install signs along Route 101 that read, “Welcome to world-famous Langroyd.”

After that, the number of travellers stopping by the neighbourhood increased, and hot dogs also became famous.

Hot dogs have been priced at 99 cents for a long time but are now selling for $3.75. Jake Pestana plans to build an annex next year and open a hot dog restaurant. Pestana said that installing a large wooden hot dog sculpture in the restaurant building would create a wonderful “road culture.”

Ahead of the US presidential election on November 5 next year, three debates between presidential candidates will be held in September and October of the same year.

The Committee on Presidential Debates (CPD), a non-profit private organization, announced the schedule for this debate on the 20th.

Next year’s presidential candidate debates will be held at

▲ Texas State University, Texas (September 16)

▲ Virginia State University, Virginia (October 1)

▲ University of Utah, Utah (October 9), and the vice-presidential candidate debate will also be held in September. It takes place once on the 25th.

All discussions will be ad-free for 90 minutes starting at 9 PM ET, with details to be announced at a later date. Since its establishment in 1987, CPD has hosted a debate every presidential election. However, the Republican National Committee (RNC) declared that it would not participate in the 2022 debate due to CPD’s bias.

Previously, former President Donald Trump did not participate in the 2020 presidential election when CPD held the second debate virtually due to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, former President Trump, who is expected to face a rematch with President Joe Biden in next year’s presidential election, said in a broadcast interview in June that he hopes to debate President Biden. In fact, the campaign of President Biden, the Democratic presidential candidate, has not yet announced whether President Biden will participate in the debate.

Accordingly, the American media stated that it remains to be seen whether the actual debate will proceed normally in this presidential election. Furthermore, there is a possibility that independent candidate Robert Kennedy Jr. may participate in this debate.

In order to participate in a debate hosted by CPD, you must secure an average of 15% or more support nationwide in pre-debate opinion polls, and currently, candidate Kennedy is recording an average of 14.7% support. If candidate Kennedy participates, the debate will be held in a three-party manner, with independents as well as Democrats and Republicans.

If former President Donald Trump returns to power, it is known that he will implement stronger anti-immigration policies than during his first term.

The New York Times (NYT) reported on the 11th that former President Trump is preparing a strict immigration policy that will strengthen restrictions on legal immigration as well as illegal immigration.

Since taking office in 2017, former President Trump has implemented policies such as building a wall to prevent the inflow of immigrants on the southern border with Mexico and strengthening the arrest and deportation of illegal immigrants by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

According to the NYT, if he wins next year’s presidential election, former President Trump plans to build large-scale detention centres to deport illegal immigrants across the United States. This is a facility to house illegal immigrants arrested by ICE until they are deported to their home countries.

The NYT predicted that if former President Trump’s plan is implemented, millions of illegal immigrants could be deported.

The explanation is that illegal immigrants who have recently immigrated to the United States, including those who recently crossed through the southern border, will be subject to crackdowns. In addition, former President Trump is known to be planning to significantly narrow the scope for legally entering the United States, including student and work visas.

First, former President Trump plans to strengthen inspections to determine whether foreigners have threatening thoughts or attitudes toward the United States when they apply for a U.S. visa. Former President Trump plans to reinvestigate whether immigrants who were allowed to reside in the United States for humanitarian reasons, such as Afghans who escaped from the Taliban and entered the United States as refugees, actually qualify as refugees.

In addition, former President Trump plans to pursue a policy of not granting American citizenship to children of illegal immigrants, even if they were born in the United States.

California Governor Gavin Newsom’s voter approval rating has hit an all-time low.

Dissatisfaction with California’s high cost of living and homelessness emerged as the biggest complaints cited by voters. According to a public opinion poll conducted by UC Berkeley, the voter no confidence rate in California Governor Gavin Newsom’s job performance was 49 percent, a 10 percent increase from the beginning of the year.

Governor Newsom’s approval rating for his job performance is 44 percent, an 11 percent drop from the beginning of the year, hitting an all-time low.

The decline in Governor Newsom’s approval rating comes as Governor Newsom has recently established himself as a representative young Democratic politician who actively supports President Joe Biden on the national stage and is at odds with conservative Republican governors.

This poll was conducted on 6,342 registered voters in California between the 24th and 30th of last month. Governor Newsom’s popularity has declined among voters in all California states, regardless of party affiliation.

Among Democratic voters, Governor Newsom’s job approval rating was 66 percent, down 16 percent from the beginning of the year.

Democratic supporters, the vote of no confidence was 25 percent, double the number of votes from the beginning of the year.

Governor Newsom’s popularity among Democratic voters, regardless of whether they were progressive or centrist, declined similarly.

Among independent voters, Newsom’s approval rating fell from 49 percent to 37 percent. As uncertainty about the economy spread across the country, including California, it appeared to have contributed to the increase in the no-confidence rate in Governor Newsom.

California residents have been shown to be highly dissatisfied with the current state of California, especially due to the recently worsening homeless problem and increasing crime.

According to a recent poll, 55 percent of California adults say their state is headed in the wrong direction.

The economy, inflation, jobs, and homelessness were revealed as the biggest concerns cited by California voters.

Governor Newsom’s term expires in 2026, but with his approval rating already plummeting, he could lose momentum in leading the state.

The shooting occurred at a townhouse complex (Golden Oak Rd) across from the Virginia Centerville Library.

At around 11 pm on the 26th (Thursday), a woman reported to the police that her boyfriend had been shot, and another man was reported lying outside her house with a gunshot wound.

The dispatched police found a man suffering from a gunshot wound in the kitchen and found another man lying dead with a gunshot wound at the entrance of another townhouse and took them to the hospital. It is reported that they are being treated in hospital with no life-threatening injuries.

While many residents were shocked by the shooting incident that occurred in a quiet residential area, it is believed that the cause of this incident was a parking dispute. While the investigation is still in progress, according to eyewitness testimony, when a car carrying a group of men entered the complex that night and tried to park, a resident came out and told them to move their cars, saying that the parking lot in the complex was designated for residents. The parking dispute seemed to be over as they drove away, but not long after, they reappeared and knocked on the resident’s front door. A fight ensued and one of the groups shot a resident in the abdomen, and the man, who was carrying a firearm, also fired several shots at them as they ran away. It is understood that one of the groups suffered a gunshot wound and collapsed during this process.

Police confirmed the identities of all those involved in the incident, but said there were no other criminal charges, and believe that a conflict over a parking dispute escalated into a shooting. In the end, when the two threatened each other with guns, the other men also took out their guns and started shooting at each other, leading to a tragedy like an action movie from the Wild West that occurred in a quiet residential area.

Los Angeles was selected as the city with the highest number of organized theft crimes in the country.

As a result of the National Retail Federation surveying 177 brands across the country and analyzing organized theft crimes by city, L.A. City was selected as the city with the most victims of organized theft crimes in the country this year.

As a result, Los Angeles has earned the stigma of being the city with the highest number of organized theft crimes in the country for the past five consecutive years.

Following Los Angeles, the San Francisco Bay Area has maintained its second place as the city with the most organized theft crimes for three years.

It was found that Houston, New York, and Seattle were followed by the most organized theft crimes.

According to the National Retail Federation report released on the 26th, the amount of in-store product loss among surveyed retail stores last year due to organized theft was 1.6 percent, an increase from 1.4 percent a year ago. The amount has increased by $18.2 billion.

The National Retail Federation explained that the level of theft and violence targeting retail establishments is reaching unprecedented levels, causing a major blow to the retail industry.
Because the damage caused by organized theft is not limited to famous brands nationwide, all large and small businesses in the United States are suffering damage.

Recently, flash mob-style organized thefts have occurred one after another in areas of Los Angeles, with the Americana Mall in Glendale, Macy’s, and Nordstrom suffering damage. Their crimes were caught on video and released to the public, causing harm to shopping mall employees and customers. Safety issues are also being raised.

In Los Angeles, to respond to the damage caused by gang thieves, a task force has been formed to intensively crack down and investigate organized thefts and efforts are being made to apprehend suspects. However, residents are concerned that greatly strengthened crackdowns and punishments for gang thieves are urgently needed. The voice is high.